Dorian Gray

Would you like to sell your soul in exchange for eternal youth and beauty? The latest adaptation of Oscar Wilde’s novel The Picture of Dorian Gray, tells how innocence could be manipulated into monstrosity and how beauty and youth are worshipped at the expense of moral values.

Set during the Victorian era London, Dorian Gray was initially an innocent, handsome young man. Soon after his arrival in London, he got introduced to Lord Henry Wotton by Basil Hallward. Basil, who admired the youthful beauty of Dorian, made a painting of him which proved to be his best artwork ever. Upon completion of the painting, Dorian was so fascinated by it that he vowed to give anything to maintain his youthful look. Slowly but surely, Dorian got manipulated by Henry who preaches hedonism although he don’t seem to be very much a hedonist himself.

Later, Dorian met and fell in love with Sibyl Vane, a young actress. After a fight with Dorian, Sybil committed suicide by drowning herself and this begins the transformation of Dorian Gray. Sybil’s death led Dorian to increasingly involved in a hedonist lifestyle. For each immoral thing that he committed, the picture of Dorian aged instead of Dorian himself. The peak of it was when Dorian killed Basil after an argument. Afterwards, Dorian left England to travel around the world for years. By the time he returned to London, everyone he knew aged, while he remained youthful. It was by that time that Sybil’s brother, James, planned to avenge his sister’s death.

The cast was great. Ben Barnes perfectly played the innocent, yet charming Dorian Gray. Even after his transformation into an immoral individual, Dorian still looked innocent instead of menacing. The supporting cast such as Ben Chaplin and Colin Firth also performed well as Basil Hallward and Henry Wotton, respectively. The most significant performance from the actresses came from Rebecca Hall, mostly because other actresses did not get enough screen time to be considered significant.

The set is great, capable of putting in the gothic look on London. Dark, menacing alleys out in the streets, but shiny inside the mansions showed the wide gap of the society during that era. There were variations from the novel, but essentially they were not too significant to alter the original story. As a whole, I believe this is a great adaptation of the novel. As an additional note, even at the present day, people still looking for ways to preserve the youthful beauty even if that means they must pay a price for it. As for the society, society never changes. It is always the society to blame for corrupting innocence and turning it into monstrosity.

Final Rating: 8.0

Credits:

Directed by Oliver Parker

Written by Toby Finlay

Based on the novel The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde

Starring: Ben Barnes, Colin Firth, Ben Chaplin, Rebecca Hall, Rachel Hurd-Wood, Emilia Fox

Release year: 2009

IMDB Rating: 6.7

Sherlock Holmes

The legendary detective is back and under Guy Ritchie’s interpretation, Sherlock Holmes is more like of a fast-paced action movie rather than a detective drama. Hardcore fans may not be appreciative of this movie but those less devout to Holmes may find this reboot as entertaining.

Sherlock Holmes and Dr. John Watson must race against time to thwart Lord Henry Blackwood’s plan to take over the British Empire and restore the glory days of England. They are joined by Irene Adler who works for the mysterious man that had a great interest in the device owned by Lord Blackwood.

For devout fans, the portrayal of Holmes by Robert Downey, Jr. is probably strayed out from what’s been told in the books, from the clothes to the physical appearance and as well as characterization. Jude Law’s portrayal of Watson is also different than that of the books. Law’s Watson is a lot more resourceful and clever and skillful in martial arts. Law’s also taller than Downey, which made me think whether the roles should be reversed. Irene Adler is played by Rachel McAdams which suits the character well. Charming and elegant as well as smart, she is indeed a worthy rival of Holmes. Although Inspector Lestrade’s relationship with Holmes could have been explored more thoroughly, the plot prefers to focus on the Holmes’ relationships with Watson and Adler. Eddie Marsan however, played his part well in portraying the Scotland Yard inspector. I did however, imagined that Lestrade is a much taller and bulkier man than Marsan.

Production set and the visuals were great, as they managed to portray London as a somewhat dark place where crimes could have popped out of anywhere. The only mismatch was probably Holmes’ clothes which according to Guy Ritchie was intentionally made to be different. So, you won’t see Holmes in a long overcoat and wearing a deerstalker in this movie.

Overall, Sherlock Holmes is an entertaining movie in terms of fast-paced plot, great performance by the cast (Robert Downey,Jr. is nominated for Oscar for his role as Holmes), and Ritchie’s directorial style – although I still like Ritchie’s style in Lock, Stock and Snatch. Loyal fans of Holmes may be disappointed with the new interpretation of their favorite characters, but other than the fans probably going to enjoy this movie.

Final Score: 7.0.

Credits:

Directed by Guy Ritchie

Screenplay by Michael Robert Johnson, Anthony Peckham, Simon Kinberg

Story by Lionel Wigram, based on the characters by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Starring: Robert Downey, Jr., Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, Mark Strong, Eddie Marsan

Release year: 2009

IMDB Rating: 7.7

The Invention of Lying

Have you ever imagined a world where no lies exist? Well, in The Invention of Lying it’s a world where movies are simply a person reading out a script, no religion, and advertisements are well, honestly delivered. When Mark Bellison suddenly finds himself capable of ‘speaking something that wasn’t’, he inadvertently discovers ‘religion’.

While some people may be a bit offended, moderately offended, or outraged by this movie, this is somewhat a hilarious comedy with some romance in it. Unfortunately, I personally think that this flick could do better without the romantic element and rather focus on being a religious satire. Ricky Gervais stars as Mark Bellison who discovers lying when he told a bank clerk that he had $800 in his account instead of $300 just to avoid being evicted by his landlord.

The major lie that he did was when his mother was dying and scared of what would happen after death, which is eternal nothingness. To comfort her, Mark told her that after a person died, he/she will get a mansion and will have the chance to meet the people that had been dead and be together for eternity. Somehow, the medical staffs and the doctor heard about this, and hence the concept of “the man in the sky that controls everything’ was born.

As things develop further, Mark also struggling in his effort to pursue his love interest, Anna who somewhat cares more about the genetic makeup of a man rather than his character. She finds a perfect genetic match in Mark’s rival, Brad instead of choosing Mark.

Ricky Gervais played well here, although the rest of the cast were somewhat average for this sort of film. Notable cameos were Jason Bateman, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Stephen Merchant and Edward Norton. Gervais’ portrayal of Mark was somewhat similar to his portrayal of Bertram Pincus in Ghost Town, a single, middle aged man, living alone, with an additional impression of a loser.

Overall, it’s a hilarious movie. Unique in its main story but as I wrote earlier, would have been better of without the romantic element. This movie simply shows that a world without lies is probably a lame place to live in. No imaginations other than truth and of course, probably no concept of ‘the man in the sky who controls everything’.

Final rating: 8.0

Credits:

Directed by Ricky Gervais & Matthew Robinson

Written by Ricky Gervais & Matthew Robinson

Starring: Ricky Gervais, Jennifer Garner, Jonah Hill, Louis C.K., Christopher Guest, Rob Lowe, Tina Fey, Jeffrey Tambor, Jason Bateman, Stephen Merchant, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Edward Norton.

Release year: 2009

IMDB Rating: 6.6 

Avatar

The latest from James Cameron took around 15 years in the making from script to finish and the film is probably opening a new chapter in filmmaking with its ability to blend live-action and computer-generated objects.

Set in Pandora where humans actively mine the highly prized unobtanium, a diplomatic effort is initially worked on to peacefully relocate the indigenous Na’vi who live around the unobtanium deposit. Genetically engineered Na’vi bodies able to be remotely controlled by humans are used to blend with the indigenous in order to gain the trust of the Na’vis so that the people will be willingly relocate to avoid more hostile efforts. One of the operators of these avatars (the genetically engineered Na’vis) is Jake Sully who takes over the job from his dead brother. Another is Dr. Grace Augustine, the head of the Avatar Program, a scientist who has been studying both Pandora and its people for some time.

Contrary to the initial expectations, Jake managed to adapt to the lifestyle of the Na’vis and gains the trust from them, while his relationship with Neytiri, the daughter of the Na’vi chieftain Eytucan, grows deeper. It is when the administrator of the miners, Parker Selfridge decided that the time for the diplomatic approach has ran out that Jake must choose whether to side with the miners or with the Na’vis.

This movie has its strength in the visuals rather than the plot or the acting. As previously noted, a new chapter of filmmaking has opened with Avatar, something that is likely to be utilized by other filmmakers. The remarkable blending between virtual and live objects in the film actually made everything seems to be so alive. In addition, the design of Pandora itself is amazing, from the plants to the wildlife, to the landscapes, including the floating mountains. The war machines wachines however, are limited to several ships and a mini-mech model like from Matrix.

Acting is not the main point of the movie, but it’s pretty good nonetheless, although most of the facial expressions are captured with cameras designed specifically by Cameron for this movie. Sam Worthington may not be a famous actor before Avatar, but I’m sure he is now. With the success of Avatar, it is likely that Cameron will follow it up with two sequels as he had told the press before.

The theme itself is a criticism on real-world situations where the strong used to prevail over the weak with the help of technology. From the ancient history of United States when the indians were driven out up to the modern imperialism where oil resources are being fought over. One line from the movie was evidently a total joke when the leader of the mercenaries Col. Miles Quaritch said that ‘terror must be fought with terror’.

We may be awed by the beauty of the nature in Pandora, but let’s not forget that we also have such beautiful landscape and wildlife here in the real world, gradually deteriorating due to human’s exploitation of natural resources. If we want to have such Pandoran beauty, we probably ought to scale back on our own exploitation of our beloved planet.

Overall, Avatar is a wholly remarkable movie in terms of its visuals. Cameron’s success in designing Pandora and visualizing it on screen (including designing its language) is what make this movie worth watching (in 3D if available). It seems that Avatar is already a candidate for the best movie in the next Academy Awards, which I believe highly probably. Along with it, Cameron probably grab the best director award as well.

Final rating: 9.0

Credits:

Directed by James Cameron

Written by James Cameron

Starring: Sam Worthington, Sigourney Weaver, Zoë Saldaña, C.C.H. Pounder, Michelle Rodriguez, Giovanni Ribisi, Joel David Moore, Stephen Lang, Wes Studi, Laz Alonso.

Release year: 2009

IMDB Rating: 8.8

Zombieland

Welcome to the post-apocalyptic America where zombies roam the streets, searching for fresh meat. Well, actually there were just a few zombies spotted on the streets. To survive in Zombieland, several rules ought to be followed such as rule #1: Cardio. Fat people are easy targets in Zombieland because the zombies always outrun them. Another rule is rule #2: Double Tap. Always hit them zombies twice in head, just to make sure.

The movie follows the journey of a college student of which name remains unknown even after the film ends, but assigned as “Columbus”, based on his hometown. He met a man whose name also remains unknown, but designated as “Tallahassee” because he’s from Tallahassee. Later, two sisters Wichita and Little Rock conned them and took their car and guns, although later all four travelled together towards California to visit Pacific Playland. En route, they met Bill Murray who apparently managed to survive by disguising himself as a zombie.

Categorized as a horror-comedy film, I feel that we can drop the horror stuff, because it’s not a scary movie. Not unless you are afraid of zombie makeups. The story itself is never scary, but instead, it is fun. Columbus is a hero but with lack of hero mentality, while Tallahassee is more like of Yosemite Sam without a moustache just as stated by Columbus himself. As for the sisters Wichita and Little Rock, well they lack the specific characterizations. Overall, it’s a very entertaining film, despite its simple story. It reminds me of Simon Pegg’s Shaun of the Dead which I believe was also a very entertaining movie.

Acting is pretty standard here, but the main strength of the movie is in its storytelling. While Shaun of the Dead was rather made as a spoof to Dawn of the Dead, Zombieland is no spoof at all but it’s quite fresh for a zombie flick. A sequel is already thought of, although not yet scripted. It would be interesting to see how the next adventure will be. Will it be able to resume the success or will it fall short of expectations? Nevertheless, for fresh entertainment, I recommend you to watch Zombieland.

Final rating: 8.0 (Yeah, I still think Shaun of the Dead is slightly better)

Credits:

Directed by Ruben Fleischer

Written by Paul Wernick and Rhett Reese

Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Emma Stone, and Abigail Breslin

Release year: 2009

IMDB Rating: 8.0

Ong Bak 2: The Beginning (องค์บาก 2)

Considered as a prequel to Tony Jaa’s Ong-Bak: Muay Thai Warrior, the movie is set in 15th century Thailand, during the conflict between the Ayutthaya kingdom and the Sukhothai kingdom.

Tony Jaa played Tien, the son of Lord Sihadecho who was killed by Lord Rajasena. Tien managed to escape the murder but found himself captured by slave traders. The day he was captured by the slave traders was the day when a group of pirates led by Cher Nung raided the slavers. Tien was freed and decided to follow Cher Nung and his Pha Beek Krut pirates.

During his stay with the pirates, Tien learned many forms of martial arts. This made him the strongest among other pirates in the settlement. Yet, after a while, Tien decided that he must settle the score with Lord Rajasena who murdered his father and mother. And so he left the village and seek vengeance but later must face a bitter truth regarding his father’s killers.

Obviously set as an action movie, the flick features bloody fight scenes and Tony Jaa using various kinds of weapons. The story is very much simple, although the ending is unclear. It is said that the story will be resolved in the third installment, Ong Bak 3 to be released sometime in 2010.

Not much to expect in terms of acting since this is mostly an action movie, so it’s pretty standard performance by the cast. The production set is pretty good, though. In addition, the rural view of Thailand probably added some exotic impression to the movie. Overall, fight movies enthusiasts should be entertained by this one.

Final rating: 6.5

Credits:

Directed by Tony Jaa & Panna Rittikrai

Story by Tony jaa & Panna Rittikrai

Screenplay by Ek Iemchuen & Nonthakorn Thaweesuk

Starring: Tony Jaa, Sorapong Chatree, Sarunyoo Wongkrachang, Santisuk Promsiri

Release year: 2008

IMDB Rating: 6.4

Dean Spanley

Based on the novel My Talks with Dean Spanley written by Lord Dunsany, Dean Spanley explores the relationship between Henslowe Fisk and his father, Horatio, as well as his brother Harrington who died during the Boer War.

Probably one of the most unusual movies that I have ever seen, Dean Spanley begins with the regular visit by Henslowe Fisk to his father’s home, which occurred every Thursday since Henslowe’s mother passed away. On a particular Thursday, Henslowe took his father to attend a lecture about transmigration of souls, where they met Dean Spanley, a local clergyman. After two additional encounters with Dean Spanley, Henslowe invited him to his home by offering him a bottle of Tokay wine.

Later, Henslowe learned that Dean believed that he was a Welsh Spaniel in his previous life. This easily explained why he was attending the lecture about transmigration of souls – or simply said: reincarnation. A conveyancer named Wrather later joined the meetings, as he became intrigued by Dean’s belief of him being a dog during his previous life. Henslowe also met Wrather during the lecture and it happened that Wrather also provided Henslowe the Tokay wine, which is the Dean’s favorite.

The story connects to Horatio when Henslowe learned that Dean had an initial of WAG in his name. Horatio once in a while told Henslowe that he had a dog named Wag, and this made Henslowe set up another meeting with Dean and Wrather at Horatio’s house. It is in this last meeting that the Dean’s story about his previous life relates – in a very peculiar way - to Harrington Fisk who died in the Boer War.

Maybe not everyone would love the story because of its unusual way of telling it, but surely most people would love the performance from Peter O’Toole as Horatio Fisk. This does not mean that the rest of the cast were mediocre. Actually, all of them were great. Jeremy Northam and Sam Neill, even Bryan Brown and Judy Parfitt who played Wrather and Mrs. Brimley, respectively, did very well in this movie. The dogs were also convincing.

Although peculiar, the movie is very enjoyable overall. The story was well told and the cast were remarkable. A combination that I would naturally expect from a British movie. As for the set and the shots, they were equally good. Note that the film is set during the Edwardian era in England.

Final rating: 9.0

Credits:

Directed by Toa Fraser

Screenplay by Alan Sharp

Based on a novel by Lord Dunsany

Starring: Jeremy Northam, Peter O’Toole, Sam Neill, Bryan Brown, Judy Parfitt

Release year: 2008

IMDB Rating: 7.1